Main Article Content

Omar Muhammad Khayoun
Ghaleb Farhat

Abstract

The research revolved the consequences of performing plastic surgery in terms of harming the human body, but despite its seriousness, the doctor's right justifies it in treating the disease, rather it aims to maintain it, and therefore it is not considered as an attack on it. This is regardless of the outcome of the treatment, as long as the doctor has directed his art to the purpose of treating the patient, and what is based on the permissibility is the recognition of the medical profession by law, and thus inevitably allows all necessary or appropriate actions to be undertaken, and given that these actions aim to preserve the body And it works in his interest so that it proceeds normally and naturally, because the law authorizes it, and it must allow the work of the doctor to be the purpose of medical or surgical intervention "Treat the patient." Treatment is the purpose upon which the right of physicians to medicine and surgery is based. The medical intervention must aim at ridding the patient of his illness, mitigating its severity, preventing the disease, and discovering the causes of the disease.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Article Details

How to Cite
Muhammad Khayoun ع., & Farhat غ. (2024). The Legal Nature of Liability for Plastic Surgery. Bilad Alrafidain Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 6(3), 102–113. https://doi.org/10.54720/bajhss/2024.060309
Section
Articles